The Crazy Gang are high on the “brilliant success” of their Venezuela caper and looking for new targets.
Like Alexander the Great, Donald Trump weeps because there are no more worlds to conquer.
But wait! Actually, there are still lots of places to conquer.
Colombia is right next door to Venezuela and the US fleet is already just offshore, so how about taking down President Gustavo Petro?
“He’s a sick man who likes making cocaine and sending it to the United States, and he’s not going to be doing it very long,” according to The Donald (who is lying about Petro.)
ALSO READ: Trump pitches Venezuela oil to US majors – and hits skepticism
“Operation Colombia sounds good to me,” Trump said last week. He also name-checked Mexico (“Something will have to be done about it”), Iran (“We are loaded and ready to go!”) and Cuba (“It looks like it’s ready to fall”).
But any of these “missions”’ would require lots of planning. He wants another hit right now.
Instant triumphs tend to be smaller and less rewarding (arresting Russian-registered tankers in mid-ocean, for example).
Greenland not strategically important
There is only one whole country on his list that Trump could conquer in one week from a standing start: Greenland.
Which may be why Steve Miller, White House deputy chief of staff, moved it to the top of the hit-list last week.
Trump insisted that Greenland is “so strategic right now, it’s covered with Russian and Chinese ships all over the place. We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security.”
No, they don’t. Greenland is a region of zero strategic importance.
READ MORE: ‘US-SA relations will improve’
I spent some time on Greenland’s west coast recently (Ilulissat), and Russian and Chinese ships were conspicuous by their total absence.
Greenland was briefly important strategically 60 to 70 years ago, when interceptors and radar stations based there might shoot down nuclear-armed Soviet bombers on their way to North America.
Then the technology shifted to ballistic missiles that fly through space and the number of troops on American airbases in Greenland dropped from 10 000 to 200.
If Washington wants some minerals, just negotiate a contract, start digging – and pay for them.
Could Trump get away with Greenland invasion?
Given the servile posture, or just sheer laziness, of most American media, if Trump invades Greenland he would probably get away with it at home.
However, he would not get away with it abroad.
The Russians and the Chinese would be happy to see the US invade Greenland, but for America to seize the territory of a country that has been a loyal member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato) for 77 years is a very bad look.
“Nobody’s going to fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland,” said Steve Miller confidently – and that’s true.
American air and naval power would quickly overwhelm any attempted Danish defence of Greenland and there’s no point in getting people killed for nothing.
READ MORE: US seizes Russia-flagged oil tanker chased to North Atlantic
However, the political and strategic impact would be immense.
“If the United States decides to militarily attack another Nato country,” warned Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, “then everything would stop. That includes Nato and therefore post-Second World War security.”
A post-Nato alliance including every country except the United States would probably reform, but the enemy would be different.
That might even be enough to shock American voters into starting the fightback in the midterm elections in November. Or am I just clutching at straws?
