Kaizer Chiefs’ pre-season has taken a dramatic twist as Cape Town Spurs dig in their heels over the controversial signings of Asanele Velebhayi and Luke Baartman. While Amakhosi remain adamant the duo arrived as free agents, Spurs argue otherwise, triggering a contractual standoff that could shape transfer dealings across South African football.
The Premier Soccer League’s Dispute Resolution Chamber (DRC) has delayed its ruling in the high-profile battle involving Cape Town Spurs, Kaizer Chiefs, and AmaZulu. The DRC has now requested further documentation from all parties relating to the contested transfers of Velebhayi, Baartman, and Liam Bern, who recently joined Usuthu.
This development means the final decision may take longer than expected, prolonging the uncertainty over the players’ status.
Chiefs claim free agent status: Spurs disagree
Following Spurs’ relegation to the SAFA-governed ABC Motsepe Regional League, Chiefs swiftly secured the signatures of Velebhayi and Baartman. According to Kaizer Chiefs, the pair became free agents once Spurs dropped out of the professional tiers. AmaZulu, meanwhile, signed Liam Bern under similar assumptions.
But Spurs aren’t buying it. The Mother City club insists these players remain under valid contracts, regardless of relegation. Their firm stance has forced the PSL to intervene.
‘These players signed in good faith’ – Spurs CEO fires back
“Our word is our bond,” declared Cape Town Spurs CEO Alexi Efstathiou. “These players signed agreements in good faith. Their families budgeted based on those commitments. Relegation doesn’t erase responsibility, it tests character.”
With rumours swirling about Amakhosi’s acquisition of the players without transfer fees, Efstathiou stood firm. “They believe in this club. Allowing others to walk away free undermines their loyalty and sacrifices. Fairness isn’t selective.”
No DRC sitting as Spurs prepare their defence
Tuesday’s expected DRC sitting did not take place. Instead, the PSL requested additional submissions.
“No, there was no sitting on Tuesday,” a source confirmed. “They asked to submit further documents from their side, and they were given two days to do that. Once we have sight of the submission, we may need to put in our own. No further clarity.”
Spurs remain committed to honouring their side of the contract. “We told every contracted player: Show up, train, honour your commitment, and we will honour ours, every salary, every benefit, on time. No excuses,” the club emphasised.
Spurs call for respect, not ransom
The club revealed that 14 contracted players are still training under their banner. But while the battle continues, Spurs have made it clear they are not looking to block transfers unfairly.
“We’ve never stood in a player’s way. If there is interest from clubs for any of our players, we will listen,” said Efstathiou.
However, the club has placed clear value on its assets. Velebhayi, a dangerous winger, is reportedly valued at R10 million. Baartman, an 18-year-old prodigy chased by European sides, represents another critical investment. “We are not demanding ransom; we are asking for recognition of that investment through civilised negotiation.”
Chiefs and PSL face crucial precedent
Kaizer Chiefs may have believed they followed the rulebook, but Spurs have turned this into a matter of principle. The outcome could set a defining precedent for relegated clubs and the future of player mobility in South African football.
“Cape Town Spurs aren’t just fighting relegation,” the club concluded. “They’re fighting for the soul of South African football, one honoured contract, one on-time salary, one act of principled care at a time.”
Who are you backing, Kaizer Chiefs or Spurs?
Let us know by leaving a comment below or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1.
Subscribe to The South African website’s newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
